Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 11100101101110001… |
… | …010100101000101001 |
3 | 2221120210010012020121 |
4 | 130231301110220221 |
5 | 1001121131102434 |
6 | 22055255123241 |
7 | 2141030262556 |
oct | 345561245051 |
9 | 87523105217 |
10 | 30832675369 |
11 | 120922723a1 |
12 | 5b85973521 |
13 | 2ba4a48912 |
14 | 16c6c7ba2d |
15 | c06ca77b4 |
hex | 72dc54a29 |
30832675369 has 4 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 32173226496. Its totient is φ = 29492124244.
The previous prime is 30832675351. The next prime is 30832675403. The reversal of 30832675369 is 96357623803.
It is a semiprime because it is the product of two primes, and also a Blum integer, because the two primes are equal to 3 mod 4.
It is a cyclic number.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 30832675369 - 25 = 30832675337 is a prime.
It is a super-2 number, since 2×308326753692 (a number of 22 digits) contains 22 as substring.
It is a Duffinian number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (30832675339) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (17) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 3 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 670275529 + ... + 670275574.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (8043306624).
Almost surely, 230832675369 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
30832675369 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1340551127).
30832675369 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
30832675369 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 1340551126.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 4898880, while the sum is 52.
The spelling of 30832675369 in words is "thirty billion, eight hundred thirty-two million, six hundred seventy-five thousand, three hundred sixty-nine".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.064 sec. • engine limits •