Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 101101001001010110101… |
… | …001001110111000000010 |
3 | 101222120212222122020112100 |
4 | 231021112221032320002 |
5 | 401312224012141442 |
6 | 10333122044211230 |
7 | 440066601131310 |
oct | 55112651167002 |
9 | 11876788566470 |
10 | 3102420037122 |
11 | a9680225a55a |
12 | 42132a239b16 |
13 | 196731822573 |
14 | aa22d5110b0 |
15 | 55a7b16184c |
hex | 2d256a4ee02 |
3102420037122 has 48 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 7701340637952. Its totient is φ = 884195222400.
The previous prime is 3102420037121. The next prime is 3102420037183. The reversal of 3102420037122 is 2217300242013.
3102420037122 is a `hidden beast` number, since 31 + 0 + 242 + 0 + 0 + 371 + 22 = 666.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (3102420037121) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (19) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 23 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 30650698 + ... + 30751749.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (160444596624).
Almost surely, 23102420037122 is an apocalyptic number.
3102420037122 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (4598920600830).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
3102420037122 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
3102420037122 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 61402863 (or 61402860 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 4032, while the sum is 27.
Adding to 3102420037122 its reverse (2217300242013), we get a palindrome (5319720279135).
The spelling of 3102420037122 in words is "three trillion, one hundred two billion, four hundred twenty million, thirty-seven thousand, one hundred twenty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.077 sec. • engine limits •