Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 10011100110100… |
… | …010001101100100 |
3 | 211220211021001112 |
4 | 103212202031210 |
5 | 1133142244313 |
6 | 52344444152 |
7 | 11102223620 |
oct | 2346421544 |
9 | 756737045 |
10 | 328868708 |
11 | 159701a23 |
12 | 92179658 |
13 | 53197b8c |
14 | 3196a180 |
15 | 1dd128a8 |
hex | 139a2364 |
328868708 has 48 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 695589888. Its totient is φ = 133056000.
The previous prime is 328868707. The next prime is 328868711. The reversal of 328868708 is 807868823.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (328868707) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (13) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 15 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 30968 + ... + 40208.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (14491456).
Almost surely, 2328868708 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 328868708, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (347794944).
328868708 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (366721180).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
328868708 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
328868708 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 9324 (or 9322 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 1032192, while the sum is 50.
The square root of 328868708 is about 18134.7376049393. The cubic root of 328868708 is about 690.2517515857.
The spelling of 328868708 in words is "three hundred twenty-eight million, eight hundred sixty-eight thousand, seven hundred eight".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.127 sec. • engine limits •