Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 100101010011001011… |
… | …011000111101000001 |
3 | 10211101011111222111000 |
4 | 211103023120331001 |
5 | 1124010322403020 |
6 | 30222050442213 |
7 | 2615324041416 |
oct | 452313307501 |
9 | 124334458430 |
10 | 40050200385 |
11 | 15a92326368 |
12 | 7918893369 |
13 | 3a135aac30 |
14 | 1d1d11810d |
15 | 1096101090 |
hex | 9532d8f41 |
40050200385 has 64 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 76712832000. Its totient is φ = 19707888384.
The previous prime is 40050200371. The next prime is 40050200401. The reversal of 40050200385 is 58300205004.
40050200385 is a `hidden beast` number, since 400 + 50 + 200 + 3 + 8 + 5 = 666.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 40050200385 - 211 = 40050198337 is a prime.
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (27).
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (17) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 63 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 5301591 + ... + 5309139.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (1198638000).
Almost surely, 240050200385 is an apocalyptic number.
40050200385 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (45) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
40050200385 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (36662631615).
40050200385 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
40050200385 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 10599 (or 10593 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 4800, while the sum is 27.
Adding to 40050200385 its reverse (58300205004), we get a palindrome (98350405389).
The spelling of 40050200385 in words is "forty billion, fifty million, two hundred thousand, three hundred eighty-five".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.071 sec. • engine limits •