Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 100110101100111011… |
… | …010000010111001001 |
3 | 10222021002210110221100 |
4 | 212230323100113021 |
5 | 1140101303422304 |
6 | 31031315332013 |
7 | 3000536331450 |
oct | 465473202711 |
9 | 128232713840 |
10 | 41555920329 |
11 | 16695263010 |
12 | 8078bb1009 |
13 | 3bc3523891 |
14 | 20230a9b97 |
15 | 11333ca439 |
hex | 9aced05c9 |
41555920329 has 96 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 77597245440. Its totient is φ = 20797430400.
The previous prime is 41555920327. The next prime is 41555920331. The reversal of 41555920329 is 92302955514.
41555920329 is a `hidden beast` number, since 4 + 1 + 55 + 592 + 0 + 3 + 2 + 9 = 666.
41555920329 is digitally balanced in base 2, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.
It is an interprime number because it is at equal distance from previous prime (41555920327) and next prime (41555920331).
It is not a de Polignac number, because 41555920329 - 21 = 41555920327 is a prime.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (41555920327) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 95 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 4915384 + ... + 4923830.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (808304640).
Almost surely, 241555920329 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
41555920329 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (36041325111).
41555920329 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
41555920329 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 8731 (or 8728 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 486000, while the sum is 45.
The spelling of 41555920329 in words is "forty-one billion, five hundred fifty-five million, nine hundred twenty thousand, three hundred twenty-nine".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.067 sec. • engine limits •