Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 110111100011011100001111… |
… | …0110100011100100011101010 |
3 | 2101002012001212121200222100000 |
4 | 1233012320132310130203222 |
5 | 1003022120221301400132 |
6 | 4451141305245123430 |
7 | 204633145225544433 |
oct | 15706703664344352 |
9 | 2332161777628300 |
10 | 488656126200042 |
11 | 131778999001359 |
12 | 469809b7b59576 |
13 | 17c880c8955078 |
14 | 8895122d1248a |
15 | 3b76101e5587c |
hex | 1bc6e1ed1c8ea |
488656126200042 has 48 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 1098019042821792. Its totient is φ = 162877815876240.
The previous prime is 488656126200041. The next prime is 488656126200139. The reversal of 488656126200042 is 240002621656884.
488656126200042 is a `hidden beast` number, since 4 + 8 + 8 + 6 + 5 + 6 + 1 + 2 + 620 + 0 + 0 + 4 + 2 = 666.
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (54).
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (488656126200041) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 23 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 12844384 + ... + 33797787.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (22875396725454).
Almost surely, 2488656126200042 is an apocalyptic number.
488656126200042 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (609362916621750).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
488656126200042 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
488656126200042 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 46663745 (or 46663733 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 8847360, while the sum is 54.
The spelling of 488656126200042 in words is "four hundred eighty-eight trillion, six hundred fifty-six billion, one hundred twenty-six million, two hundred thousand, forty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.062 sec. • engine limits •