Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1001011111111100… |
… | …10101001100111101 |
3 | 111011102020112010000 |
4 | 10233332111030331 |
5 | 40421024224341 |
6 | 2202015104513 |
7 | 240243615114 |
oct | 45776251475 |
9 | 14142215100 |
10 | 5099836221 |
11 | 21877a7487 |
12 | ba3b12139 |
13 | 63374598c |
14 | 36544cc7b |
15 | 1ecac78b6 |
hex | 12ff9533d |
5099836221 has 20 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 7635680800. Its totient is φ = 3392122536.
The previous prime is 5099836213. The next prime is 5099836229. The reversal of 5099836221 is 1226389905.
5099836221 is a `hidden beast` number, since 509 + 9 + 83 + 62 + 2 + 1 = 666.
It is an interprime number because it is at equal distance from previous prime (5099836213) and next prime (5099836229).
It is not a de Polignac number, because 5099836221 - 23 = 5099836213 is a prime.
It is a Duffinian number.
It is a Curzon number.
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (5099836229) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 19 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 36151 + ... + 107268.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (381784040).
Almost surely, 25099836221 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
5099836221 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (2535844579).
5099836221 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
5099836221 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 143870 (or 143861 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 233280, while the sum is 45.
The square root of 5099836221 is about 71413.1375938629. The cubic root of 5099836221 is about 1721.2821948497.
The spelling of 5099836221 in words is "five billion, ninety-nine million, eight hundred thirty-six thousand, two hundred twenty-one".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.087 sec. • engine limits •