Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 110000111011010000… |
… | …011110111010001000 |
3 | 12000121011120202010010 |
4 | 300323100132322020 |
5 | 1330042122043300 |
6 | 40044513151520 |
7 | 3536556540462 |
oct | 607320367210 |
9 | 160534522103 |
10 | 52533784200 |
11 | 20308a51687 |
12 | a22155b5a0 |
13 | 4c5299a711 |
14 | 2785057132 |
15 | 1577045a50 |
hex | c3b41ee88 |
52533784200 has 576 divisors, whose sum is σ = 185284569600. Its totient is φ = 12283084800.
The previous prime is 52533784181. The next prime is 52533784211. The reversal of 52533784200 is 248733525.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (17) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 143 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 155886432 + ... + 155886768.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (321674600).
Almost surely, 252533784200 is an apocalyptic number.
52533784200 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (50) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 52533784200, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (92642284800).
52533784200 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (132750785400).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
52533784200 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
52533784200 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 450 (or 424 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 201600, while the sum is 39.
The spelling of 52533784200 in words is "fifty-two billion, five hundred thirty-three million, seven hundred eighty-four thousand, two hundred".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.086 sec. • engine limits •