536203622341 has 4 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 550695612172. Its totient is φ = 521711632512.

The previous prime is 536203622221. The next prime is 536203622389. The reversal of 536203622341 is 143226302635.

It is a semiprime because it is the product of two primes.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in 2 ways, for example, as 440431322500 + 95772299841 = 663650^2 + 309471^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 536203622341 - 2²⁹ = 535666751429 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×536203622341² (a number of 24 digits) contains 22 as substring.

It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (37), and also a Moran number because the ratio is a prime number: 14491989793 = 536203622341 / (5 + 3 + 6 + 2 + 0 + 3 + 6 + 2 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 1).

It is a Duffinian number.

It is a self number, because there is not a number n which added to its sum of digits gives 536203622341.

It is a congruent number.

It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (536203626341) by changing a digit.

It is a polite number, since it can be written in 3 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 7245994860 + ... + 7245994933.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (137673903043).

Almost surely, 2^536203622341 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

536203622341 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (14491989831).

536203622341 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.

536203622341 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.

The sum of its prime factors is 14491989830.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 155520, while the sum is 37.

Adding to 536203622341 its reverse (143226302635), we get a palindrome (679429924976).

The spelling of 536203622341 in words is "five hundred thirty-six billion, two hundred three million, six hundred twenty-two thousand, three hundred forty-one".