Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 100111000111101101111… |
… | …0000010101000011001111 |
3 | 201001000011211121220212200 |
4 | 1032033123300111003033 |
5 | 1201042430341413420 |
6 | 15234003455132543 |
7 | 1063311262102014 |
oct | 116173360250317 |
9 | 21030154556780 |
10 | 5376690966735 |
11 | 1793272976200 |
12 | 72a056b14153 |
13 | 300034601b1a |
14 | 148339db570b |
15 | 94cd7b14b90 |
hex | 4e3dbc150cf |
5376690966735 has 72 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 10388135695392. Its totient is φ = 2570163657600.
The previous prime is 5376690966683. The next prime is 5376690966739.
5376690966735 is nontrivially palindromic in base 10.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 5376690966735 - 29 = 5376690966223 is a prime.
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (5376690966739) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (23) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 71 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 6567312 + ... + 7340501.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (144279662436).
Almost surely, 25376690966735 is an apocalyptic number.
5376690966735 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (55) formed by its first and last digit.
5376690966735 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (5011444728657).
5376690966735 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
5376690966735 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 13907917 (or 13907903 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 1157360400, while the sum is 72.
The spelling of 5376690966735 in words is "five trillion, three hundred seventy-six billion, six hundred ninety million, nine hundred sixty-six thousand, seven hundred thirty-five".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.069 sec. • engine limits •