Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 101001001110110110111… |
… | …1110001100010100101100 |
3 | 202001202021111002000102220 |
4 | 1102131231332030110230 |
5 | 1220321311130231442 |
6 | 20015201401315340 |
7 | 1123264143511110 |
oct | 122355576142454 |
9 | 22052244060386 |
10 | 5666906883372 |
11 | 189535a221899 |
12 | 77634b795b50 |
13 | 3215053b1197 |
14 | 1583cb91b740 |
15 | 9c621365eec |
hex | 5276df8c52c |
5666906883372 has 48 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 15177741922560. Its totient is φ = 1612045870272.
The previous prime is 5666906883329. The next prime is 5666906883499. The reversal of 5666906883372 is 2733886096665.
It is a super-2 number, since 2×56669068833722 (a number of 26 digits) contains 22 as substring.
It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 5666906883297 and 5666906883306.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (23) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 15 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 147280278 + ... + 147318749.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (316202956720).
Almost surely, 25666906883372 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
5666906883372 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (9510835039188).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
5666906883372 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
5666906883372 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 294599270 (or 294599268 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 470292480, while the sum is 69.
The spelling of 5666906883372 in words is "five trillion, six hundred sixty-six billion, nine hundred six million, eight hundred eighty-three thousand, three hundred seventy-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.072 sec. • engine limits •