Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 100010010010110… |
… | …100110100010000 |
3 | 1111002122022220201 |
4 | 202102310310100 |
5 | 2134243012042 |
6 | 133031544544 |
7 | 20154324124 |
oct | 4222646420 |
9 | 1432568821 |
10 | 575360272 |
11 | 275859763 |
12 | 14082b154 |
13 | 9227c686 |
14 | 565b1584 |
15 | 357a21b7 |
hex | 224b4d10 |
575360272 has 40 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 1168050240. Its totient is φ = 274032000.
The previous prime is 575360207. The next prime is 575360273. The reversal of 575360272 is 272063575.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (575360273) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (11) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 7 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 89254 + ... + 95482.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (29201256).
Almost surely, 2575360272 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 575360272, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (584025120).
575360272 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (592689968).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
575360272 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
575360272 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 6511 (or 6505 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 88200, while the sum is 37.
The square root of 575360272 is about 23986.6686307207. The cubic root of 575360272 is about 831.7253855157.
The spelling of 575360272 in words is "five hundred seventy-five million, three hundred sixty thousand, two hundred seventy-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.068 sec. • engine limits •