Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 10111010001000101101… |
… | …11010100101011000101 |
3 | 2211102111222001011110101 |
4 | 23220202313110223011 |
5 | 101044232401014442 |
6 | 1411132311124101 |
7 | 111521042030065 |
oct | 13504267245305 |
9 | 2742458034411 |
10 | 799448844997 |
11 | 2890540388a0 |
12 | 10ab31973631 |
13 | 5a506a2355a |
14 | 2a99d0953a5 |
15 | 15bdec21cb7 |
hex | ba22dd4ac5 |
799448844997 has 16 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 893440243584. Its totient is φ = 709011520000.
The previous prime is 799448844947. The next prime is 799448845003.
799448844997 is nontrivially palindromic in base 10.
799448844997 is digitally balanced in base 2, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.
It is a cyclic number.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 799448844997 - 227 = 799314627269 is a prime.
It is a Duffinian number.
It is a self number, because there is not a number n which added to its sum of digits gives 799448844997.
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (799448844937) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 15 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 16460253 + ... + 16508749.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (55840015224).
Almost surely, 2799448844997 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
799448844997 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (93991398587).
799448844997 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
799448844997 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 85100.
The product of its digits is 5267275776, while the sum is 82.
The spelling of 799448844997 in words is "seven hundred ninety-nine billion, four hundred forty-eight million, eight hundred forty-four thousand, nine hundred ninety-seven".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.071 sec. • engine limits •