Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 100110100100100110… |
… | …1100001011000101101 |
3 | 21220210202021010000210 |
4 | 1031021031201120231 |
5 | 2324120130110023 |
6 | 102015223213033 |
7 | 5661445664415 |
oct | 1151115413055 |
9 | 256722233023 |
10 | 82832660013 |
11 | 32146971514 |
12 | 140785a7179 |
13 | 7a70c589bc |
14 | 401b061645 |
15 | 224c00a593 |
hex | 134936162d |
82832660013 has 4 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 110443546688. Its totient is φ = 55221773340.
The previous prime is 82832659991. The next prime is 82832660041. The reversal of 82832660013 is 31006623828.
It is a semiprime because it is the product of two primes, and also a Blum integer, because the two primes are equal to 3 mod 4.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 82832660013 - 28 = 82832659757 is a prime.
It is a super-2 number, since 2×828326600132 (a number of 23 digits) contains 22 as substring.
It is a Duffinian number.
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (82832660093) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (17) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 3 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 13805443333 + ... + 13805443338.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (27610886672).
Almost surely, 282832660013 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
82832660013 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (27610886675).
82832660013 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
82832660013 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 27610886674.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 82944, while the sum is 39.
The spelling of 82832660013 in words is "eighty-two billion, eight hundred thirty-two million, six hundred sixty thousand, thirteen".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.072 sec. • engine limits •