Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 10101111010001001100011… |
… | …100100111011111001011001 |
3 | 110122011110000022112222212010 |
4 | 111322021203210323321121 |
5 | 100112134433014222434 |
6 | 540532505530140133 |
7 | 26203262622321516 |
oct | 2572114344737131 |
9 | 418143008488763 |
10 | 96354966945369 |
11 | 28779a03965490 |
12 | a9822a3581649 |
13 | 419c307c73272 |
14 | 19b1868c8030d |
15 | b216319409e9 |
hex | 57a26393be59 |
96354966945369 has 32 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 143575868177280. Its totient is φ = 56970716774400.
The previous prime is 96354966945361. The next prime is 96354966945443.
96354966945369 is nontrivially palindromic in base 10.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 96354966945369 - 23 = 96354966945361 is a prime.
It is a super-2 number, since 2×963549669453692 (a number of 29 digits) contains 22 as substring.
It is a Curzon number.
It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 96354966945291 and 96354966945300.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (96354966945361) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 31 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 39538137 + ... + 41904345.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (4486745880540).
Almost surely, 296354966945369 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
96354966945369 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (47220901231911).
96354966945369 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
96354966945369 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 2396361.
The product of its digits is 30611001600, while the sum is 84.
The spelling of 96354966945369 in words is "ninety-six trillion, three hundred fifty-four billion, nine hundred sixty-six million, nine hundred forty-five thousand, three hundred sixty-nine".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.069 sec. • engine limits •