Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 101110101010100001… |
… | …0110000001110111110 |
3 | 100120122212201221010120 |
4 | 1131111002300032332 |
5 | 3120213011024042 |
6 | 114011502115410 |
7 | 10145215504062 |
oct | 1352502601676 |
9 | 316585657116 |
10 | 100211033022 |
11 | 39554574361 |
12 | 1750857bb66 |
13 | 95b045a859 |
14 | 4bc90b5aa2 |
15 | 2917a22dec |
hex | 17550b03be |
100211033022 has 32 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 201804003072. Its totient is φ = 33173716224.
The previous prime is 100211033009. The next prime is 100211033023. The reversal of 100211033022 is 220330112001.
It is a super-2 number, since 2×1002110330222 (a number of 23 digits) contains 22 as substring.
It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 100211032992 and 100211033010.
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (100211033023) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (19) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 15 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 1080718 + ... + 1169774.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (6306375096).
Almost surely, 2100211033022 is an apocalyptic number.
100211033022 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (101592970050).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
100211033022 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
100211033022 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 90352.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 72, while the sum is 15.
Adding to 100211033022 its reverse (220330112001), we get a palindrome (320541145023).
The spelling of 100211033022 in words is "one hundred billion, two hundred eleven million, thirty-three thousand, twenty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.067 sec. • engine limits •