Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1001001100011110001011… |
… | …1101110000101001100111 |
3 | 1022210111022221021122121122 |
4 | 2103013202331300221213 |
5 | 2311120001131411414 |
6 | 33300224104204155 |
7 | 2062261621110566 |
oct | 223074275605147 |
9 | 38714287248548 |
10 | 10109865888359 |
11 | 324862a804066 |
12 | 117343976965b |
13 | 58448292a313 |
14 | 26d46a5a1bdd |
15 | 127eaa398b8e |
hex | 931e2f70a67 |
10109865888359 has 16 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 10156810718208. Its totient is φ = 10063038877632.
The previous prime is 10109865888341. The next prime is 10109865888413. The reversal of 10109865888359 is 95388856890101.
It is a cyclic number.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 10109865888359 - 224 = 10109849111143 is a prime.
It is a Duffinian number.
It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 10109865888292 and 10109865888301.
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (10109865888319) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (23) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 15 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 509482892 + ... + 509502734.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (634800669888).
Almost surely, 210109865888359 is an apocalyptic number.
10109865888359 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (46944829849).
10109865888359 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
10109865888359 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 22694.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 149299200, while the sum is 71.
The spelling of 10109865888359 in words is "ten trillion, one hundred nine billion, eight hundred sixty-five million, eight hundred eighty-eight thousand, three hundred fifty-nine".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.074 sec. • engine limits •