Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 10010111000010111… |
… | …00010010000111111 |
3 | 222011102112122100022 |
4 | 21130023202100333 |
5 | 131224413244044 |
6 | 4353455322355 |
7 | 506122336340 |
oct | 113413422077 |
9 | 28142478308 |
10 | 10136462399 |
11 | 4331850258 |
12 | 1b6a8203bb |
13 | c5705955b |
14 | 6c23260c7 |
15 | 3e4d663ee |
hex | 25c2e243f |
10136462399 has 32 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 12367649280. Its totient is φ = 8114504832.
The previous prime is 10136462393. The next prime is 10136462407. The reversal of 10136462399 is 99326463101.
10136462399 is digitally balanced in base 2, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.
It is a Cunningham number, because it is equal to 1006802-1.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 10136462399 - 212 = 10136458303 is a prime.
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (10136462393) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (17) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 31 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 8355917 + ... + 8357129.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (386489040).
Almost surely, 210136462399 is an apocalyptic number.
10136462399 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (19) formed by its first and last digit.
10136462399 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (2231186881).
10136462399 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
10136462399 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 2079.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 209952, while the sum is 44.
The spelling of 10136462399 in words is "ten billion, one hundred thirty-six million, four hundred sixty-two thousand, three hundred ninety-nine".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.097 sec. • engine limits •