Search a number
-
+
10141121021341 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin1001001110010010100111…
…1010101000010110011101
31022220111000011022220202111
42103210221322220112131
52312123003440140331
633322433334154021
72064446301261352
oct223445172502635
938814004286674
1010141121021341
11325a909490082
121179500ab2911
135873c404b44b
14270b935ac629
15128bd929ddb1
hex93929ea859d

10141121021341 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 10141121021342. Its totient is φ = 10141121021340.

The previous prime is 10141121021263. The next prime is 10141121021357. The reversal of 10141121021341 is 14312012114101.

10141121021341 is digitally balanced in base 2, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.

It is a strong prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 7544108195716 + 2597012825625 = 2746654^2 + 1611525^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is a de Polignac number, because none of the positive numbers 2k-10141121021341 is a prime.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (10141121025341) by changing a digit.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 5070560510670 + 5070560510671.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (5070560510671).

Almost surely, 210141121021341 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

10141121021341 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

10141121021341 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

10141121021341 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 192, while the sum is 22.

Adding to 10141121021341 its reverse (14312012114101), we get a palindrome (24453133135442).

The spelling of 10141121021341 in words is "ten trillion, one hundred forty-one billion, one hundred twenty-one million, twenty-one thousand, three hundred forty-one".