Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 11101101011111011111… |
… | …00010110000100111110 |
3 | 10121111211221222222122220 |
4 | 32311331330112010332 |
5 | 113203000134021342 |
6 | 2100331341150210 |
7 | 133460023550013 |
oct | 16657574260476 |
9 | 3544757888586 |
10 | 1020020220222 |
11 | 363651905743 |
12 | 14582a85b366 |
13 | 75258c02bb3 |
14 | 375252b370a |
15 | 1b7ee1785ec |
hex | ed7df1613e |
1020020220222 has 8 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 2040040440456. Its totient is φ = 340006740072.
The previous prime is 1020020220209. The next prime is 1020020220223. The reversal of 1020020220222 is 2220220200201.
It is a sphenic number, since it is the product of 3 distinct primes.
1020020220222 is an admirable number.
It is a super-3 number, since 3×10200202202223 (a number of 37 digits) contains 333 as substring.
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (1020020220223) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 3 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 85001685013 + ... + 85001685024.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (255005055057).
Almost surely, 21020020220222 is an apocalyptic number.
1020020220222 is a primitive abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors, none of which is abundant.
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
1020020220222 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
1020020220222 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 170003370042.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 128, while the sum is 15.
Adding to 1020020220222 its reverse (2220220200201), we get a palindrome (3240240420423).
The spelling of 1020020220222 in words is "one trillion, twenty billion, twenty million, two hundred twenty thousand, two hundred twenty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.069 sec. • engine limits •