Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 10111001100010110110101… |
… | …111101001010000111001010 |
3 | 111101011111202020120111221100 |
4 | 113030112311331022013022 |
5 | 101332214131120133002 |
6 | 1000540032525122230 |
7 | 30325363635551442 |
oct | 2714266575120712 |
9 | 441144666514840 |
10 | 102004231021002 |
11 | 2a55782a191732 |
12 | b53512a6b9376 |
13 | 44bbc5b12792b |
14 | 1b29061591122 |
15 | bbd56de5811c |
hex | 5cc5b5f4a1ca |
102004231021002 has 24 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 221009355424260. Its totient is φ = 34001381384640.
The previous prime is 102004231020973. The next prime is 102004231021067. The reversal of 102004231021002 is 200120132400201.
It is a happy number.
102004231021002 is a `hidden beast` number, since 1 + 0 + 20 + 0 + 423 + 10 + 210 + 0 + 2 = 666.
It can be written as a sum of positive squares in 2 ways, for example, as 93204755456121 + 8799475564881 = 9654261^2 + 2966391^2 .
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (18).
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 11 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 34930774 + ... + 37738142.
Almost surely, 2102004231021002 is an apocalyptic number.
102004231021002 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (119005124403258).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
102004231021002 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
102004231021002 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 4825958 (or 4825955 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 192, while the sum is 18.
Adding to 102004231021002 its reverse (200120132400201), we get a palindrome (302124363421203).
The spelling of 102004231021002 in words is "one hundred two trillion, four billion, two hundred thirty-one million, twenty-one thousand, two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.092 sec. • engine limits •