Search a number
-
+
103323000300181 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin10111011111100011000010…
…101110101110001010010101
3111112211120201112122010211121
4113133203002232232022111
5102020321001034101211
61003425533035403541
730522561160511524
oct2737430256561225
9445746645563747
10103323000300181
112aa160470540a2
12b7088338b35b1
13458641793a40c
141b72c077b64bb
15be2a05a41271
hex5df8c2bae295

103323000300181 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 103323000300182. Its totient is φ = 103323000300180.

The previous prime is 103323000300103. The next prime is 103323000300203. The reversal of 103323000300181 is 181003000323301.

It is a strong prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 100084317766225 + 3238682533956 = 10004215^2 + 1799634^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is a de Polignac number, because none of the positive numbers 2k-103323000300181 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×1033230003001812 (a number of 29 digits) contains 22 as substring.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (103323000300101) by changing a digit.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 51661500150090 + 51661500150091.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (51661500150091).

Almost surely, 2103323000300181 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

103323000300181 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

103323000300181 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

103323000300181 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 1296, while the sum is 25.

Adding to 103323000300181 its reverse (181003000323301), we get a palindrome (284326000623482).

The spelling of 103323000300181 in words is "one hundred three trillion, three hundred twenty-three billion, three hundred thousand, one hundred eighty-one".