Search a number
-
+
1043593241 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin111110001100111…
…111100000011001
32200201201000210112
4332030333200121
54114124440431
6251315454105
734601252615
oct7614774031
92621630715
101043593241
11496099059
122515b7335
131382913c2
149c858345
1561942c2b
hex3e33f819

1043593241 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 1043593242. Its totient is φ = 1043593240.

The previous prime is 1043593223. The next prime is 1043593349. The reversal of 1043593241 is 1423953401.

It is a weak prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 1016334400 + 27258841 = 31880^2 + 5221^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 1043593241 - 210 = 1043592217 is a prime.

It is a super-4 number, since 4×10435932414 (a number of 37 digits) contains 4444 as substring.

It is a Sophie Germain prime.

It is a Curzon number.

It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 1043593198 and 1043593207.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (1043593211) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (17) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 521796620 + 521796621.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (521796621).

Almost surely, 21043593241 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

1043593241 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

1043593241 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

1043593241 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 12960, while the sum is 32.

The square root of 1043593241 is about 32304.6937920792. The cubic root of 1043593241 is about 1014.3248978005.

The spelling of 1043593241 in words is "one billion, forty-three million, five hundred ninety-three thousand, two hundred forty-one".