Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 11111100000111000100… |
… | …01001011111101011011 |
3 | 10211111220121120101121200 |
4 | 33300130101023331123 |
5 | 120220041320313300 |
6 | 2145233443005243 |
7 | 141141641234454 |
oct | 17603421137533 |
9 | 3744817511550 |
10 | 1082806026075 |
11 | 388240855994 |
12 | 155a31669823 |
13 | 7b15385a6c7 |
14 | 3a59db3412b |
15 | 1d276260200 |
hex | fc1c44bf5b |
1082806026075 has 36 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 1986728992248. Its totient is φ = 563411260800.
The previous prime is 1082806026067. The next prime is 1082806026139. The reversal of 1082806026075 is 5706206082801.
1082806026075 is a `hidden beast` number, since 10 + 8 + 28 + 0 + 6 + 0 + 2 + 607 + 5 = 666.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 1082806026075 - 23 = 1082806026067 is a prime.
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (45).
It is a self number, because there is not a number n which added to its sum of digits gives 1082806026075.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (23) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 35 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 58679449 + ... + 58697898.
Almost surely, 21082806026075 is an apocalyptic number.
1082806026075 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (15) formed by its first and last digit.
1082806026075 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (903922966173).
1082806026075 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
1082806026075 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 117377404 (or 117377396 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 322560, while the sum is 45.
The spelling of 1082806026075 in words is "one trillion, eighty-two billion, eight hundred six million, twenty-six thousand, seventy-five".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.071 sec. • engine limits •