Search a number
-
+
11210455331 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin10100111000011000…
…11111100100100011
31001221021110010200022
422130030133210203
5140424334032311
65052222544055
7544543204145
oct123414374443
931837403608
1011210455331
114833012019
12220a43802b
13109870282a
14784c14c95
154592b15db
hex29c31f923

11210455331 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 11210455332. Its totient is φ = 11210455330.

The previous prime is 11210455261. The next prime is 11210455337. The reversal of 11210455331 is 13355401211.

11210455331 is digitally balanced in base 2, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.

It is a strong prime.

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 11210455331 - 230 = 10136713507 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×112104553312 (a number of 21 digits) contains 22 as substring.

It is a Sophie Germain prime.

It is a self number, because there is not a number n which added to its sum of digits gives 11210455331.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (11210455337) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (17) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 5605227665 + 5605227666.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (5605227666).

Almost surely, 211210455331 is an apocalyptic number.

11210455331 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

11210455331 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

11210455331 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 1800, while the sum is 26.

Adding to 11210455331 its reverse (13355401211), we get a palindrome (24565856542).

The spelling of 11210455331 in words is "eleven billion, two hundred ten million, four hundred fifty-five thousand, three hundred thirty-one".