Search a number
-
+
112220101511101 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin11001100001000001000111…
…010010011000011110111101
3112201100010200211012212212201
4121201001013102120132331
5104202103231441323401
61034401111500031501
732431430505143353
oct3141010722303675
9481303624185781
10112220101511101
1132836306804a71
1210705010b32591
134a80405581b5c
141d9d6a645d7d3
15ce9180782b01
hex6610474987bd

112220101511101 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 112220101511102. Its totient is φ = 112220101511100.

The previous prime is 112220101511083. The next prime is 112220101511149. The reversal of 112220101511101 is 101115101022211.

It is a weak prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 106766218535076 + 5453882976025 = 10332774^2 + 2335355^2 .

It is an emirp because it is prime and its reverse (101115101022211) is a distict prime.

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 112220101511101 - 217 = 112220101380029 is a prime.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (112220101515101) by changing a digit.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 56110050755550 + 56110050755551.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (56110050755551).

Almost surely, 2112220101511101 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

112220101511101 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

112220101511101 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

112220101511101 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 40, while the sum is 19.

Adding to 112220101511101 its reverse (101115101022211), we get a palindrome (213335202533312).

The spelling of 112220101511101 in words is "one hundred twelve trillion, two hundred twenty billion, one hundred one million, five hundred eleven thousand, one hundred one".