Search a number
-
+
11222110321 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin10100111001110001…
…11101000001110001
31001222002101021022121
422130320331001301
5140440330012241
65053320434241
7545044235542
oct123470750161
931862337277
1011222110321
114839652644
122212318981
13109ac53786
147865aa4c9
1545a314ad1
hex29ce3d071

11222110321 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 11222110322. Its totient is φ = 11222110320.

The previous prime is 11222110313. The next prime is 11222110331. The reversal of 11222110321 is 12301122211.

11222110321 is digitally balanced in base 2, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.

It is a weak prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 9220800625 + 2001309696 = 96025^2 + 44736^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 11222110321 - 23 = 11222110313 is a prime.

It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 11222110295 and 11222110304.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (11222110331) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (17) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 5611055160 + 5611055161.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (5611055161).

Almost surely, 211222110321 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

11222110321 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

11222110321 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

11222110321 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 48, while the sum is 16.

Adding to 11222110321 its reverse (12301122211), we get a palindrome (23523232532).

The spelling of 11222110321 in words is "eleven billion, two hundred twenty-two million, one hundred ten thousand, three hundred twenty-one".