Search a number
-
+
11610707225501 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin1010100011110101010000…
…0101000110101110011101
31112002222021011001010221002
42220331110011012232131
53010212212022204001
640405515114520045
72305563102020246
oct250752405065635
945088234033832
1011610707225501
1137770895a14aa
121376296436025
13662b6743ab47
142c1d65877ccd
1515204b53346b
hexa8f54146b9d

11610707225501 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 11610707225502. Its totient is φ = 11610707225500.

The previous prime is 11610707225437. The next prime is 11610707225549. The reversal of 11610707225501 is 10552270701611.

11610707225501 is digitally balanced in base 2, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.

It is a strong prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 11210744580025 + 399962645476 = 3348245^2 + 632426^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 11610707225501 - 26 = 11610707225437 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×116107072255012 (a number of 27 digits) contains 22 as substring.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (11610707225101) by changing a digit.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 5805353612750 + 5805353612751.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (5805353612751).

Almost surely, 211610707225501 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

11610707225501 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

11610707225501 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

11610707225501 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 29400, while the sum is 38.

The spelling of 11610707225501 in words is "eleven trillion, six hundred ten billion, seven hundred seven million, two hundred twenty-five thousand, five hundred one".