Search a number
-
+
121011011112301 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin11011100000111100010010…
…010101001100110101101101
3120212110112120102112220212121
4123200330102111030311231
5111330121022321043201
61105211405133432541
734326520443640342
oct3340742225146555
9525415512486777
10121011011112301
1135615533027812
12116a48b293b751
13526a39ba10a7b
1421c4d6da3a7c9
15decb929039a1
hex6e0f1254cd6d

121011011112301 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 121011011112302. Its totient is φ = 121011011112300.

The previous prime is 121011011112139. The next prime is 121011011112311. The reversal of 121011011112301 is 103211110110121.

It is a strong prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 119026572604900 + 1984438507401 = 10909930^2 + 1408701^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is a de Polignac number, because none of the positive numbers 2k-121011011112301 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×1210110111123012 (a number of 29 digits) contains 22 as substring.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (121011011112311) by changing a digit.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 60505505556150 + 60505505556151.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (60505505556151).

Almost surely, 2121011011112301 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

121011011112301 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

121011011112301 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

121011011112301 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 12, while the sum is 16.

Adding to 121011011112301 its reverse (103211110110121), we get a palindrome (224222121222422).

The spelling of 121011011112301 in words is "one hundred twenty-one trillion, eleven billion, eleven million, one hundred twelve thousand, three hundred one".