Search a number
-
+
1221111002021 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin10001110001001111111…
…000110011001110100101
311022201220022210010111012
4101301033320303032211
5130001313404031041
62332545354352005
7154136161154621
oct21611770631645
94281808703435
101221111002021
114309633653a9
121787ab72b605
138b1c51c5c91
14431601b4181
1521b6d2623eb
hex11c4fe333a5

1221111002021 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 1221111002022. Its totient is φ = 1221111002020.

The previous prime is 1221111001991. The next prime is 1221111002039. The reversal of 1221111002021 is 1202001111221.

It is a strong prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 1028490081025 + 192620920996 = 1014145^2 + 438886^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is a de Polignac number, because none of the positive numbers 2k-1221111002021 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×12211110020212 (a number of 25 digits) contains 22 as substring.

It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 1221111001987 and 1221111002005.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (1221111002051) by changing a digit.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 610555501010 + 610555501011.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (610555501011).

Almost surely, 21221111002021 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

1221111002021 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

1221111002021 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

1221111002021 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 16, while the sum is 14.

Adding to 1221111002021 its reverse (1202001111221), we get a palindrome (2423112113242).

The spelling of 1221111002021 in words is "one trillion, two hundred twenty-one billion, one hundred eleven million, two thousand, twenty-one".