Search a number
-
+
130103130330001 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin11101100101001111111110…
…110111100001001110010001
3122001122201220211220212111201
4131211033332313201032101
5114023102202331030001
61140412315234511201
736255432566066503
oct3545177667411621
9561581824825451
10130103130330001
1138500478320614
1212712a37135501
13577989877bbaa
14241b04cc6dd73
15100943351d501
hex7653fede1391

130103130330001 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 130103130330002. Its totient is φ = 130103130330000.

The previous prime is 130103130329987. The next prime is 130103130330007. The reversal of 130103130330001 is 100033031301031.

It is a happy number.

It is a strong prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 74910340565776 + 55192789764225 = 8655076^2 + 7429185^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 130103130330001 - 215 = 130103130297233 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×1301031303300012 (a number of 29 digits) contains 22 as substring.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (130103130330007) by changing a digit.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 65051565165000 + 65051565165001.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (65051565165001).

Almost surely, 2130103130330001 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

130103130330001 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

130103130330001 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

130103130330001 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 243, while the sum is 19.

Adding to 130103130330001 its reverse (100033031301031), we get a palindrome (230136161631032).

The spelling of 130103130330001 in words is "one hundred thirty trillion, one hundred three billion, one hundred thirty million, three hundred thirty thousand, one".