Search a number
-
+
13101321029989 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin1011111010100110001110…
…0101100000100101100101
31201101110210120220010222211
42332221203211200211211
53204123001140424424
643510355213523421
72521352643216313
oct276514345404545
951343716803884
1013101321029989
1141a126a197215
121577159aa3571
137405ac086cba
143341706bd0b3
1517abde867b94
hexbea63960965

13101321029989 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 13101321029990. Its totient is φ = 13101321029988.

The previous prime is 13101321029983. The next prime is 13101321030029. The reversal of 13101321029989 is 98992012310131.

13101321029989 is digitally balanced in base 2, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.

It is a weak prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 13095025877025 + 6295152964 = 3618705^2 + 79342^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 13101321029989 - 211 = 13101321027941 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×131013210299892 (a number of 27 digits) contains 22 as substring.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (13101321029983) by changing a digit.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 6550660514994 + 6550660514995.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (6550660514995).

Almost surely, 213101321029989 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

13101321029989 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

13101321029989 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

13101321029989 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 209952, while the sum is 49.

The spelling of 13101321029989 in words is "thirteen trillion, one hundred one billion, three hundred twenty-one million, twenty-nine thousand, nine hundred eighty-nine".