Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1100000111010110000100… |
… | …1000001110111011000000 |
3 | 1202011102002012222200120200 |
4 | 3001311201020032323000 |
5 | 3221220010210224440 |
6 | 44155134425005200 |
7 | 2543235011326023 |
oct | 301654110167300 |
9 | 52142065880520 |
10 | 13320323133120 |
11 | 427613216a783 |
12 | 15b1699323800 |
13 | 7581410cbc83 |
14 | 3409c83251ba |
15 | 18175b13ec30 |
hex | c1d6120eec0 |
13320323133120 has 168 divisors, whose sum is σ = 45818557811520. Its totient is φ = 3551915888640.
The previous prime is 13320323133053. The next prime is 13320323133133. The reversal of 13320323133120 is 2133132302331.
13320323133120 is a `hidden beast` number, since 1 + 3 + 3 + 2 + 0 + 32 + 313 + 312 + 0 = 666.
It is a super-3 number, since 3×133203231331203 (a number of 40 digits) contains 333 as substring.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 23 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 67036476 + ... + 67234884.
Almost surely, 213320323133120 is an apocalyptic number.
13320323133120 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (10) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
13320323133120 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (32498234678400).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
13320323133120 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
13320323133120 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 221743 (or 221730 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 5832, while the sum is 27.
Adding to 13320323133120 its reverse (2133132302331), we get a palindrome (15453455435451).
The spelling of 13320323133120 in words is "thirteen trillion, three hundred twenty billion, three hundred twenty-three million, one hundred thirty-three thousand, one hundred twenty".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.084 sec. • engine limits •