Search a number
-
+
133343113412429 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin11110010100011001011100…
…111010000111111101001101
3122111010110212211200212101222
4132110121130322013331031
5114434143144013144204
61151332551452413125
740041502440641204
oct3624313472077515
9574113784625358
10133343113412429
113953a551301068
1212b56956a771a5
1359532810090cb
1424cdbac09023b
15106386147aabe
hex79465ce87f4d

133343113412429 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 133343113412430. Its totient is φ = 133343113412428.

The previous prime is 133343113412401. The next prime is 133343113412459. The reversal of 133343113412429 is 924214311343331.

It is a weak prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 75282172840900 + 58060940571529 = 8676530^2 + 7619773^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 133343113412429 - 240 = 132243601784653 is a prime.

It is a Sophie Germain prime.

It is a Curzon number.

It is a self number, because there is not a number n which added to its sum of digits gives 133343113412429.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (133343113412459) by changing a digit.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 66671556706214 + 66671556706215.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (66671556706215).

Almost surely, 2133343113412429 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

133343113412429 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

133343113412429 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

133343113412429 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its digits is 559872, while the sum is 44.

The spelling of 133343113412429 in words is "one hundred thirty-three trillion, three hundred forty-three billion, one hundred thirteen million, four hundred twelve thousand, four hundred twenty-nine".