Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 10000010010110… |
… | …10111011100100 |
3 | 100112012102202210 |
4 | 20021122323210 |
5 | 234442443312 |
6 | 21321403420 |
7 | 3246552225 |
oct | 1011327344 |
9 | 315172683 |
10 | 136687332 |
11 | 7017a241 |
12 | 39939570 |
13 | 2241a5a2 |
14 | 1422124c |
15 | beeee3c |
hex | 825aee4 |
136687332 has 24 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 319175136. Its totient is φ = 45528448.
The previous prime is 136687307. The next prime is 136687337. The reversal of 136687332 is 233786631.
136687332 is digitally balanced in base 3, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (136687337) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (13) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 7 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 16588 + ... + 23420.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (13298964).
Almost surely, 2136687332 is an apocalyptic number.
136687332 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (12) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
136687332 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (182487804).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
136687332 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
136687332 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 8507 (or 8505 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its digits is 108864, while the sum is 39.
The square root of 136687332 is about 11691.3357662844. The cubic root of 136687332 is about 515.1211981069.
The spelling of 136687332 in words is "one hundred thirty-six million, six hundred eighty-seven thousand, three hundred thirty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.062 sec. • engine limits •