Search a number
-
+
142611281 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin10001000000000…
…01001101010001
3100221100101220022
420200001031101
5243002030111
622052353225
73351114221
oct1040011521
9327311808
10142611281
1173555a6a
123b915815
1323712a97
1414d24081
15c7c02db
hex8801351

142611281 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 142611282. Its totient is φ = 142611280.

The previous prime is 142611277. The next prime is 142611307. The reversal of 142611281 is 182116241.

It is an a-pointer prime, because the next prime (142611307) can be obtained adding 142611281 to its sum of digits (26).

It is a weak prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 87984400 + 54626881 = 9380^2 + 7391^2 .

It is an emirp because it is prime and its reverse (182116241) is a distict prime.

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 142611281 - 22 = 142611277 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×1426112812 = 40675954936921922, which contains 22 as substring.

It is a self number, because there is not a number n which added to its sum of digits gives 142611281.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (142611881) by changing a digit.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 71305640 + 71305641.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (71305641).

Almost surely, 2142611281 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

142611281 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

142611281 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

142611281 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.

The product of its digits is 768, while the sum is 26.

The square root of 142611281 is about 11941.9965248697. The cubic root of 142611281 is about 522.4578918013.

The spelling of 142611281 in words is "one hundred forty-two million, six hundred eleven thousand, two hundred eighty-one".