Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 10010010001100… |
… | …10111101110010 |
3 | 101200110111020021 |
4 | 21020302331302 |
5 | 303221111400 |
6 | 23113434054 |
7 | 3541015153 |
oct | 1110627562 |
9 | 350414207 |
10 | 153300850 |
11 | 7959721a |
12 | 4340b92a |
13 | 259b6481 |
14 | 1650792a |
15 | d6d271a |
hex | 9232f72 |
153300850 has 12 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 285139674. Its totient is φ = 61320320.
The previous prime is 153300841. The next prime is 153300853. The reversal of 153300850 is 58003351.
It is a happy number.
153300850 is digitally balanced in base 2, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.
It can be written as a sum of positive squares in 3 ways, for example, as 150136009 + 3164841 = 12253^2 + 1779^2 .
It is a super-2 number, since 2×1533008502 = 47002301221445000, which contains 22 as substring.
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (25).
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (153300853) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 5 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 1532959 + ... + 1533058.
Almost surely, 2153300850 is an apocalyptic number.
153300850 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (10) formed by its first and last digit.
153300850 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (131838824).
153300850 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
153300850 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 3066029 (or 3066024 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 1800, while the sum is 25.
The square root of 153300850 is about 12381.4720449549. The cubic root of 153300850 is about 535.1984589952.
The spelling of 153300850 in words is "one hundred fifty-three million, three hundred thousand, eight hundred fifty".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.071 sec. • engine limits •