Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1010111101001000100… |
… | …0110001101111110001 |
3 | 122222210121122102010211 |
4 | 2233102020301233301 |
5 | 11040423013010001 |
6 | 222243450224121 |
7 | 16411666016263 |
oct | 2572210615761 |
9 | 588717572124 |
10 | 188209110001 |
11 | 72901155010 |
12 | 30586a25041 |
13 | 149955b13a3 |
14 | 9176177b33 |
15 | 4d6825c351 |
hex | 2bd2231bf1 |
188209110001 has 4 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 205319029104. Its totient is φ = 171099190900.
The previous prime is 188209109987. The next prime is 188209110007. The reversal of 188209110001 is 100011902881.
It is a semiprime because it is the product of two primes, and also a Blum integer, because the two primes are equal to 3 mod 4, and also an emirpimes, since its reverse is a distinct semiprime: 100011902881 = 11 ⋅9091991171.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 188209110001 - 25 = 188209109969 is a prime.
It is a Duffinian number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (188209110007) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 3 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 8554959535 + ... + 8554959556.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (51329757276).
Almost surely, 2188209110001 is an apocalyptic number.
188209110001 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (11) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
188209110001 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (17109919103).
188209110001 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
188209110001 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 17109919102.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 1152, while the sum is 31.
The spelling of 188209110001 in words is "one hundred eighty-eight billion, two hundred nine million, one hundred ten thousand, one".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.068 sec. • engine limits •