Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 101101101110101011101101… |
… | …111110100100000010010110 |
3 | 222101002220012202002220112111 |
4 | 231232223231332210002112 |
5 | 202330123012042000342 |
6 | 1551425151320341234 |
7 | 60235310224410610 |
oct | 5556535576440226 |
9 | 871086182086474 |
10 | 201120131203222 |
11 | 590a0628967280 |
12 | 1a68251901481a |
13 | 882b71598c10a |
14 | 37943a29a7db0 |
15 | 183b8e2076217 |
hex | b6eaedfa4096 |
201120131203222 has 32 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 376139214342144. Its totient is φ = 78354649032000.
The previous prime is 201120131203207. The next prime is 201120131203259. The reversal of 201120131203222 is 222302131021102.
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (22).
It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 201120131203193 and 201120131203202.
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 15 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 28879654 + ... + 35160697.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (11754350448192).
Almost surely, 2201120131203222 is an apocalyptic number.
201120131203222 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (22) formed by its first and last digit.
201120131203222 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (175019083138922).
201120131203222 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
201120131203222 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 64060764.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 576, while the sum is 22.
Adding to 201120131203222 its reverse (222302131021102), we get a palindrome (423422262224324).
The spelling of 201120131203222 in words is "two hundred one trillion, one hundred twenty billion, one hundred thirty-one million, two hundred three thousand, two hundred twenty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.083 sec. • engine limits •