Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1011101101111111001… |
… | …0101011110001110110 |
3 | 201020122112221012021100 |
4 | 2323133302223301312 |
5 | 11244302203220202 |
6 | 232253032430530 |
7 | 20354655061131 |
oct | 2733762536166 |
9 | 636575835240 |
10 | 201323101302 |
11 | 78420707854 |
12 | 33026848446 |
13 | 15ca548505b |
14 | 9a5bad7218 |
15 | 53846c941c |
hex | 2edfcabc76 |
201323101302 has 48 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 441200345040. Its totient is φ = 66338764800.
The previous prime is 201323101271. The next prime is 201323101339. The reversal of 201323101302 is 203101323102.
201323101302 is a `hidden beast` number, since 20 + 1 + 32 + 310 + 1 + 302 = 666.
It is a super-3 number, since 3×2013231013023 (a number of 35 digits) contains 333 as substring. Note that it is a super-d number also for d = 2.
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (18).
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 23 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 8849302 + ... + 8872022.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (9191673855).
Almost surely, 2201323101302 is an apocalyptic number.
201323101302 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (239877243738).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
201323101302 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
201323101302 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 28349 (or 28346 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 216, while the sum is 18.
Adding to 201323101302 its reverse (203101323102), we get a palindrome (404424424404).
The spelling of 201323101302 in words is "two hundred one billion, three hundred twenty-three million, one hundred one thousand, three hundred two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.069 sec. • engine limits •