Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1011101110000000110… |
… | …1111001001111100110 |
3 | 201020200001100120222000 |
4 | 2323200031321033212 |
5 | 11244311014444332 |
6 | 232253445350130 |
7 | 20355102520146 |
oct | 2734015711746 |
9 | 636601316860 |
10 | 201330234342 |
11 | 78424739a26 |
12 | 33029108346 |
13 | 15ca6ab19a3 |
14 | 9a5ca32926 |
15 | 5385137b7c |
hex | 2ee03793e6 |
201330234342 has 32 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 452790898560. Its totient is φ = 66301521480.
The previous prime is 201330234331. The next prime is 201330234353. The reversal of 201330234342 is 243432033102.
201330234342 is a `hidden beast` number, since 2 + 0 + 13 + 302 + 3 + 4 + 342 = 666.
It is an interprime number because it is at equal distance from previous prime (201330234331) and next prime (201330234353).
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (27).
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 15 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 22455384 + ... + 22464347.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (14149715580).
Almost surely, 2201330234342 is an apocalyptic number.
201330234342 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (251460664218).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
201330234342 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
201330234342 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 44919825 (or 44919819 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 10368, while the sum is 27.
Adding to 201330234342 its reverse (243432033102), we get a palindrome (444762267444).
The spelling of 201330234342 in words is "two hundred one billion, three hundred thirty million, two hundred thirty-four thousand, three hundred forty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.073 sec. • engine limits •