Search a number
-
+
2232839843869 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin100000011111011111101…
…000000011000000011101
321220110100110002110021011
4200133133220003000131
5243040324000000434
64425430310535221
7320213565344065
oct40373750030035
97813313073234
102232839843869
11790a3a977818
123008a5667511
1313272c3b630b
147a0da2123a5
153d134535e64
hex207dfa0301d

2232839843869 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 2232839843870. Its totient is φ = 2232839843868.

The previous prime is 2232839843851. The next prime is 2232839843929. The reversal of 2232839843869 is 9683489382322.

It is a weak prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 1208544038244 + 1024295805625 = 1099338^2 + 1012075^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 2232839843869 - 229 = 2232302972957 is a prime.

It is a super-3 number, since 3×22328398438693 (a number of 38 digits) contains 333 as substring. Note that it is a super-d number also for d = 2.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (2232839843849) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (19) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 1116419921934 + 1116419921935.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (1116419921935).

Almost surely, 22232839843869 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

2232839843869 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

2232839843869 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

2232839843869 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its digits is 214990848, while the sum is 67.

The spelling of 2232839843869 in words is "two trillion, two hundred thirty-two billion, eight hundred thirty-nine million, eight hundred forty-three thousand, eight hundred sixty-nine".