Search a number
-
+
2240330321 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin1000010110001000…
…1011101001010001
312210010120120110002
42011202023221101
514042011032241
61010150015345
7106342331165
oct20542135121
95703516402
102240330321
11a4a676369
12526347555
132991b2658
14173778ca5
15d1a3689b
hex8588ba51

2240330321 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 2240330322. Its totient is φ = 2240330320.

The previous prime is 2240330317. The next prime is 2240330327. The reversal of 2240330321 is 1230330422.

It is a weak prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 1829700625 + 410629696 = 42775^2 + 20264^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 2240330321 - 22 = 2240330317 is a prime.

It is a Sophie Germain prime.

It is a Curzon number.

It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 2240330293 and 2240330302.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (2240330327) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (13) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 1120165160 + 1120165161.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (1120165161).

Almost surely, 22240330321 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

2240330321 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

2240330321 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

2240330321 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 864, while the sum is 20.

The square root of 2240330321 is about 47332.1277886384. The cubic root of 2240330321 is about 1308.4908365032.

Adding to 2240330321 its reverse (1230330422), we get a palindrome (3470660743).

The spelling of 2240330321 in words is "two billion, two hundred forty million, three hundred thirty thousand, three hundred twenty-one".