Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1101011010000011000… |
… | …0011100110001010000 |
3 | 211000112010010200110200 |
4 | 3112200300130301100 |
5 | 12233204030301000 |
6 | 253451242055200 |
7 | 22432541301522 |
oct | 3264060346120 |
9 | 730463120420 |
10 | 230330322000 |
11 | 8975650a019 |
12 | 387811aa500 |
13 | 18948c6a77c |
14 | b210353a12 |
15 | 5ed109b500 |
hex | 35a0c1cc50 |
230330322000 has 480 divisors, whose sum is σ = 820360005504. Its totient is φ = 60217344000.
The previous prime is 230330321983. The next prime is 230330322037. The reversal of 230330322000 is 223033032.
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (18).
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 95 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 399185712 + ... + 399186288.
Almost surely, 2230330322000 is an apocalyptic number.
230330322000 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (20) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 230330322000, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (410180002752).
230330322000 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (590029683504).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
230330322000 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
230330322000 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 1004 (or 985 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 648, while the sum is 18.
Adding to 230330322000 its reverse (223033032), we get a palindrome (230553355032).
The spelling of 230330322000 in words is "two hundred thirty billion, three hundred thirty million, three hundred twenty-two thousand".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.071 sec. • engine limits •