Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1101101010001111010… |
… | …0011000110010100110 |
3 | 211102202000112012001010 |
4 | 3122203310120302212 |
5 | 12321104210400342 |
6 | 255450423043050 |
7 | 22645335432234 |
oct | 3324364306246 |
9 | 742660465033 |
10 | 234676653222 |
11 | 90586941aa0 |
12 | 395948a0486 |
13 | 1918c55c4ab |
14 | b50369b954 |
15 | 618793329c |
hex | 36a3d18ca6 |
234676653222 has 32 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 512039366784. Its totient is φ = 71111696000.
The previous prime is 234676653217. The next prime is 234676653229. The reversal of 234676653222 is 222356676432.
234676653222 is digitally balanced in base 2, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (234676653229) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (19) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 15 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 3132097 + ... + 3206147.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (16001230212).
Almost surely, 2234676653222 is an apocalyptic number.
234676653222 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (22) formed by its first and last digit.
234676653222 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (277362713562).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
234676653222 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
234676653222 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 122084.
The product of its digits is 4354560, while the sum is 48.
The spelling of 234676653222 in words is "two hundred thirty-four billion, six hundred seventy-six million, six hundred fifty-three thousand, two hundred twenty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.078 sec. • engine limits •