Search a number
-
+
240305115533081 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin110110101000111001100101…
…000011001000111100011001
31011111211221111200021002210012
4312220321211003020330121
5222444124334034024311
62211030351314331305
7101421320531536424
oct6650714503107431
91144757450232705
10240305115533081
116a628910a82405
1222b508a8b89b35
13a4118a14357a1
14434ab887b89bb
151cbad4a5e378b
hexda8e650c8f19

240305115533081 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 240305115533082. Its totient is φ = 240305115533080.

The previous prime is 240305115533059. The next prime is 240305115533129. The reversal of 240305115533081 is 180335511503042.

It is a weak prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 239618635344400 + 686480188681 = 15479620^2 + 828541^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 240305115533081 - 26 = 240305115533017 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×2403051155330812 (a number of 30 digits) contains 22 as substring.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (240305115533881) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (23) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 120152557766540 + 120152557766541.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (120152557766541).

Almost surely, 2240305115533081 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

240305115533081 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

240305115533081 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

240305115533081 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 216000, while the sum is 41.

The spelling of 240305115533081 in words is "two hundred forty trillion, three hundred five billion, one hundred fifteen million, five hundred thirty-three thousand, eighty-one".