Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1001001111000110… |
… | …1001100111001100 |
3 | 20101210011202221000 |
4 | 2103301221213030 |
5 | 20034143010002 |
6 | 1050003140300 |
7 | 115303262331 |
oct | 22361514714 |
9 | 6353152830 |
10 | 2479266252 |
11 | 1062532481 |
12 | 592374690 |
13 | 306850068 |
14 | 1973b4988 |
15 | e79d261c |
hex | 93c699cc |
2479266252 has 48 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 6601460320. Its totient is φ = 804085056.
The previous prime is 2479266203. The next prime is 2479266263. The reversal of 2479266252 is 2526629742.
2479266252 is digitally balanced in base 2 and base 4, because in such bases it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.
It is a super-2 number, since 2×24792662522 = 12293522296612255008, which contains 22 as substring.
It is a Smith number, since the sum of its digits (45) coincides with the sum of the digits of its prime factors.
It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 2479266198 and 2479266207.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 15 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 306223 + ... + 314214.
Almost surely, 22479266252 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
2479266252 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (4122194068).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
2479266252 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
2479266252 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 620487 (or 620479 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its digits is 725760, while the sum is 45.
The square root of 2479266252 is about 49792.2308397605. The cubic root of 2479266252 is about 1353.4463844397.
The spelling of 2479266252 in words is "two billion, four hundred seventy-nine million, two hundred sixty-six thousand, two hundred fifty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.069 sec. • engine limits •