Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1101111111100101100010… |
… | …01101111011111101010111 |
3 | 11000221210012212200100120100 |
4 | 12333302301031323331113 |
5 | 13013132244421213424 |
6 | 145240303303305143 |
7 | 6324132536115522 |
oct | 677626115737527 |
9 | 130853185610510 |
10 | 30772118929239 |
11 | 98944229a9706 |
12 | 354ba1444b1b3 |
13 | 1422a4c00b5cc |
14 | 78554287dbb9 |
15 | 3856c04e7dc9 |
hex | 1bfcb137bf57 |
30772118929239 has 96 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 47469968529984. Its totient is φ = 19183125749760.
The previous prime is 30772118929217. The next prime is 30772118929259. The reversal of 30772118929239 is 93292981127703.
30772118929239 is a `hidden beast` number, since 30 + 77 + 211 + 8 + 9 + 292 + 39 = 666.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 30772118929239 - 220 = 30772117880663 is a prime.
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (30772118929259) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (31) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 95 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 228115899 + ... + 228250755.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (494478838854).
Almost surely, 230772118929239 is an apocalyptic number.
30772118929239 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (16697849600745).
30772118929239 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
30772118929239 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 135217 (or 135214 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 20575296, while the sum is 63.
The spelling of 30772118929239 in words is "thirty trillion, seven hundred seventy-two billion, one hundred eighteen million, nine hundred twenty-nine thousand, two hundred thirty-nine".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.064 sec. • engine limits •