Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1011100110111111… |
… | …0111001000010011 |
3 | 22001011221001012122 |
4 | 2321233313020103 |
5 | 22340240102124 |
6 | 1233121444455 |
7 | 140140244456 |
oct | 27157671023 |
9 | 8034831178 |
10 | 3116331539 |
11 | 135a0a7012 |
12 | 72b7a072b |
13 | 3a8825779 |
14 | 217c4949d |
15 | 1338c275e |
hex | b9bf7213 |
3116331539 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 3116331540. Its totient is φ = 3116331538.
The previous prime is 3116331511. The next prime is 3116331541. The reversal of 3116331539 is 9351336113.
It is a strong prime.
It is a cyclic number.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 3116331539 - 216 = 3116266003 is a prime.
It is a super-2 number, since 2×31163315392 = 19423044521932217042, which contains 22 as substring.
Together with 3116331541, it forms a pair of twin primes.
It is a Chen prime.
It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 3116331499 and 3116331508.
It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (3116331509) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (19) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 1558165769 + 1558165770.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (1558165770).
Almost surely, 23116331539 is an apocalyptic number.
3116331539 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).
3116331539 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.
3116331539 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The product of its digits is 21870, while the sum is 35.
The square root of 3116331539 is about 55824.1125231741. The cubic root of 3116331539 is about 1460.6557914313.
The spelling of 3116331539 in words is "three billion, one hundred sixteen million, three hundred thirty-one thousand, five hundred thirty-nine".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.069 sec. • engine limits •