Search a number
-
+
312332201 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin10010100111011…
…100111110101001
3210202201010020022
4102213130332221
51114424112301
650554210225
710511531336
oct2247347651
9722633208
10312332201
11150337895
1288723975
134c92806c
142d6a398d
151c647d1b
hex129dcfa9

312332201 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 312332202. Its totient is φ = 312332200.

The previous prime is 312332191. The next prime is 312332213. The reversal of 312332201 is 102233213.

It is a weak prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 311557801 + 774400 = 17651^2 + 880^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is a de Polignac number, because none of the positive numbers 2k-312332201 is a prime.

It is a super-3 number, since 3×3123322013 (a number of 26 digits) contains 333 as substring.

It is a self number, because there is not a number n which added to its sum of digits gives 312332201.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (312332221) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (17) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 156166100 + 156166101.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (156166101).

Almost surely, 2312332201 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

312332201 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

312332201 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

312332201 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 216, while the sum is 17.

The square root of 312332201 is about 17672.9228199526. The cubic root of 312332201 is about 678.4829219861.

Adding to 312332201 its reverse (102233213), we get a palindrome (414565414).

The spelling of 312332201 in words is "three hundred twelve million, three hundred thirty-two thousand, two hundred one".